To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65361 Issue #:|65361 Summary:|gengal: is gengal.rdb (or even gengal.bin) necessary Component:|Drawing Version:|OOo 2.0.2 Platform:|All URL:| OS/Version:|Linux Status:|NEW Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|pmladek Reported by:|cmc
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 14 11:11:26 -0700 2006 ------- In gengal.cxx "gengal.rdb" seems to be only used in the #ifdef TOO_SIMPLE_BY_HALF branch, which isn't the default branch, nor does stracing the gengal binary seem to show it being used another way. So do we actually *need* gengal.rdb except for debugging use or something. Am I right here ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] program]# du -k gengal.rdb 6892 gengal.rdb [EMAIL PROTECTED] program]# Simiarly the gengal script has the soffice.sh script "# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us" logic and the OPENOFFICE_MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME stuff, and I don't think it needs all that. Though I guess in theory a launcher script it still needed for the LD_LIBRARY_PATH stuff on non rpath using systems. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
