To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63448
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 15 18:06:20 -0700 2006 ------- valence->clu: The sybase driver is definitely the driver to use...would not consider using any alternative. We have used this driver extensively in our own jdbc applications and have not found any problems ourselves. I would be very surprised if the driver was in some way non-compliant. I suspect it's probably more to do with some type of meta-data behaviour that is not fully covered by the jdbc standard, but which OO is relying on. Can you point me to what definitive criteria OO is using to decide that the table is non-editable? [I don't want to have go scrounging through the source code!] I would not expect OO to have to cut to every vendor's proprietary extensions, but this should not be the issue with this one. I will followup on the jdbc diags. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
