To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64717
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 18 01:36:06 -0700 2006 ------- While I agree that the current situation is unfortunate, I don't consider it to be a bug. OTOH the proposed patch still is buggy so that Andreas doesn't want to integrate it as is and I support this. I still maintain the point that the changed configuration (that indeed is a necessary step) should be done in a clear and "clean" manner and I already outlined a possible strategy in one of the mails we have exchanged about this topic (and Andreas also mentioned it in one of his comments). Of course we still can use a "light weight" approach if it doesn't break anything, but at least for the current patch that's not where we are now. If anybody can provide a patch that doesn't break any current feature, that can be integrated without forcing Andreas to change a lot of code or do a lot of manual rework and if it doesn't create new problems for a future move to xcu-based configurations I support its integration, but only *if*. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
