To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24271


User rainerbielefeld changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'er,vq'                   |'er,rainerbielefeld,vq'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Status|NEW                       |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Keywords|                          |oooqa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|                          |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 25 23:31:27 -0700 
2006 -------
Additional comments from fst Mon Jan 12 03:01:36 -0700 2004 are correct: There
isn't any wrong math. handling in OOo, but bay bne we have an EXCEL import 
problem.

Mathemathical handling for first:
OOo has an intelligent and correct way to handle those mathematical expressions.

Result of input '=-2^4' can't be anything else than (-2)^4! Here the '-' can't
be anything else than an algebraic sign, interpretation as a subtraction
operator for  '-(2^4) is completely useless like a mathematical expression '/3',
you always would have to ask "what divided by three" or "what should be reduced
by (2^4)".

So OOo's interpretation "-2^4 = 16" is completely correct.

Now insert a '1' in front of '-2^4' in your spreadsheet cell, so that you
get'=1-2^4'. Result changes to '-15', and that also is completely correct, the
'-' can't be anything else than a subtraction operator; a mathematical therm
with interpretation as algebraic sign "=1(-2)^4" is no valid therm.

So there doesn't exist any mathematical problem. 

'Additional comments from lcn Tue Jan 13 01:09:17 -0700 2004' told us that EXCEL
2002 has the same result as OOo, so we do not have an open-import problem.

If someone will find out, that there is an open import problem for EXCEL97, a
new open import problem should be opened.

I close this issue INVALID and opened a new  Issue 66735 concerning an
alternative way of notation.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to