To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67199
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 08:27:36 -0700 2006 ------- JSC: the more i think about it, the fix will probably not really fix the problem. It will only shift the problem and it's now more unrealistic that a conflict will happen. Building in parallel in one directory doesn't make sense in the way we build currently (one idlc call with a list of all files). In this case a lock mechanism (can be introduced by the build env) would be more helpful. If a lock file exists no second idlc call is started. The final renaming of a temporary file can still cause an error if the file already exist and the idlc has no chance to check if the temporary file is more recent in relation of the content and not the pure time stamp than the existing file. It would be possible to ingnore the renaming error but it would be a stupid solution and i won't accept it. Solution is to accept the fix and live with the potential risk to run in the error again or introduce the lock mechanism which i have already suggested in the past but wasn't accepted by the release engineers (in hh). We have had the same situation when we have introduced building in the common output tree with different platforms in parallel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
