To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67403
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 27 03:12:15 -0700
2006 -------
>From the little i could understand and rough translation of what ever was given
in the mail i have updated the same in this issue please forgive me if i have
completely change the meaning of the sentences . i have forward the request to
our engineers .
Translation of the mail sent to t-online support :
>>I correctly understood (English) the text, look it in such a way, >> the
T-Online actually the Mails of OpenOffice.org do not assume. >> because there
is too many connections. Now OpenOffice.org is the >> one of the largest open
SOURCE of projects and the May run coming >>insbesondere, even if municipalities
will transfer to OpenOffice.org, will become more >>sicher not smaller. Is there
a possibility that T-Online >>dort other volumes permits?
JFTR: It does not concern here “volumes”. T-Online furnished so-called of
session limit on its servers. If the possible number of “open connections”
(sessions) is reached to our servers, further sessions are rejected. Yes, the
number of sessions is sufficient in all rule. This problem arises usually
only if a sender for *jede* *einzelne* email liked to make a new connection. We,
the responsible persons of the internal newsgroup consider and see this
suboptimal this as a reason for the error messages. Besides would have beside
the error message in the Logs, quoted by you, also still time near (!) reacting
partner with T-Online to read its, to itself the postmaster (!) the “blocked”
server to turn can, if he regards an increase of the session limit as
necessary.
>>Diese delays obstruct the work however enormously, if one carries out in
>>Mailinglisten support, and there are Provider with those her does not
>>vorkommen.
That this does not occur with other offerers, we keep for relatively simply
explainable: Either these offerers use no session limit for the protection of
your customers from Spam or however these offerers have less customer, who gets
from there enamels sent.
>>Connected_to_194.25.134.75_but_greeting_failed./R
>>emote_host_said:_421_IP:204.16.104.2_-_Maximum_parallel_connections_for_your_IP-
>>Address_reached/
>>...
Evenly after this error message would have to be evident in the log of the
partners with T-Online. We are afraid that we, the responsible persons of the
internal newsgroup of T-Online in this affair little to align know. Us only
the reference remains that the postmaster of the dispatching server turns to the
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] specified in the log with high probability and seeks
there an increase that of session limit for its (n) servers. Naturally the
possibility would remain alternative the fact that the postmaster for each a new
session “do not open email” leaves but in-supplies the Mails at customers of
T-Online over only one session. JFTR: If *Sie* to the address mentioned
should turn, might be a little helpful this. There one becomes in this affair
exclusively with the postmaster of the server concerned to communicate want.
>>assume that this is the same case on the 20th also . So, there are many
>>SMTP servers for t-online.de and web.de domains. And looks like they
>>were refusing our connections because there were too many connections
>from openoffice.org.
Regarding T-Online: Session limit for everyone ours mailins are separately
regarded. Thus must have thus been achieved the limit for *jeden* our MXe.
Differently said: There is one *Menge* open sessions, before the session
CONTROLLER “slams shut” .
>>The problem was NOT with Spam Filter we are using or with OpenOffice.
In principle: Yes. However…; -)
>>The problem is with t-online.de and web.de SMTP servers that put limit
>>on how many SMTP connections they allow from openoffice.org.
For T-Online: This is correct. Thus the postmaster should contact either the
partner specified above to let increase by the limit or not open however for
each email a new session. We pass this on gladly internally, assume however an
establishment of contact postmaster of openoffice.org also [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is essential, in order to reach an increase of the limit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
