To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 02:28:39 -0700 2006 ------- 1st: This kind of attitude is extremely unhelpful for anything. Obviously, the majority of OO's end users are not capable of writing patches - that's what the developers do. Nobody suggested it was easy, but writing an office suite isn't easy either. Looking at some of the features which *are* being given priority, it makes more sense to me that something as fundamental as being able to handle text properly should be among them. Paying someone to provide a patch would defeat one of the major advantages of OO - it's free. If I have to pay money for a word processor not to lose my work, I'd rather spend it on purchasing a commercial package of higher quality. Also, the longer this problem is ignored, the more difficult it will become to change later. 2nd: I think this is rather irrelevant. What percentage of users need Obscure Feature X? A word processor should handle text, as much text as a user wants and in the way the user wants to format it it - everything else is second place. 3rd: However, any attempt to rejoin the split paragraphs results in immediate loss of data, without warning, and without any undo information being saved. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
