To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68700


User rainerbielefeld changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'rainerbielefeld'         |'[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],rainerbielefel
                        |                          |d'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Keywords|needmoreinfo, oooqa       |needhelp, oooqa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              OS/Version|Linux                     |All
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 17 09:24:34 -0700 
2006 -------
I checked 
<http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/38583/test.ods>
with "2.0.2  German version WIN XP: [680m5(Build9011)]" and con confirm the
effect, that OOo shows the date "2006-08-17" as normal number "38946" as 
reported. 

I can not decide whether that's an "OOo"-problem or a "KSpread"-problem. 
I additionally created an OOo document with contents "2006-08-17" and then
compared 'styles.xml' and 'content.xml'; there are many differences between OOo
and KSpread version.

a XML spcialist should decide.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to