To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 05:48:39 -0700 2006 ------- This came up on an OOoForum debate, where a newbie was asking why charting only still supports 32K rows rather than 64K. I pointed out that Excel had the same limitation. I also made the following observation whch Bob asked me to replicate here: "Why on earth when we upped the various limits in 2.0 match Excel feature by feature, rather than just go the whole hog and up the limits as sensible. I occasionally hit a 64K row limit importing CSVs and doing query result sets. Upping this limit to 256K for examole would have been a brilliant step past Excel." The 32K/256 (and then 64K/256) limits are buried in the history of how Excel stored its cell data sparsely with a 4 byte descriptor prefix (type/row/column). I am sure that you use nothing like this is Calc, so why on earth impose such arbitrary and annoying constraints. As I say it sould have useful product differentiation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
