Suggestion works with the following new REP replacement declarations in affix file:
REP st rd REP st th REP th rd REP th st REP rd th Unfortunatelly, REP suggestion hasn't worked for longer patterns (103st, 1000003st etc.), yet. Thanks for your comment. On 8 Sep 2006 06:09:50 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53643 ------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 7 23:09:50 -0700 2006 ------- English ordinals (1st 2nd etc.) seem to be correctly recognised by the spell checker but it does not offer an appropriate correction, e.g for "3st" "est" is offered but not "3rd". --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
