To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68285
User as changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|as |bmarcelly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 14 23:19:27 -0700
2006 -------
I've forgot:
> 2 - This evolution is against the classical development rule: as far as
> possible be
> backward compatible. This could have been possible by setting a new option in
> the PropertyValue sequence (4th parameter).
No it does not break "backward compatibility". Because your code has to handle
such exceptions even if they dont occure. So returning NULL will be the same
then
handling an exception. The content could not be loadd. My change can break your
code only in case your "old 1.1 code example" does not handle exceptions in
general.
Of course you cant distinguish between diffrent type of errors .. but as I've
explained: I cant distinguish between these errors internaly too .-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
