To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 22 04:52:09 -0700 2006 ------- > Shouldn't the functionality of textsearch (and textreplace) be integrated into > the base string class? Seems to me that strings Having methods for search and various manipulations in string classes seems reasonably to me. OOo's UniString and ByteString look already quite rich equiped with methods. And maybe having a regex version of their SearchAndReplace() method would be good. But that's neither what I want to do nor what I can do. Searching through a whole document and replacing matches it's different from just searching through a string only. Either that or those who implemented the currenct S&R were insane. At least for me it's just a mess in which I was finally able to find the right point to insert my code. That just to inform you what you can expect from me (resp. what not). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
