To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70311


User cloph changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED               |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Keywords|                          |oooqa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|                          |DUPLICATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 17 13:08:39 -0700 
2006 -------
OOo cannot interpret postscript itself. So it displays a preview image if
present (as is the case with your sample) - or tries to run helper programs
(ps2edit, convert, ghostscript) to create a preview.

The previews generated using the helper-programs usually provide better quality
than the low-res preview included in the eps itself.

All the applications you mentioned use ghostscript to render the eps. If you
print to a postscript file with OOo and then view the file, it will look good as
well.

It is only a display-problem if you print to postscript printers.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 12059 ***

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to