To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73083
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 4 02:54:01 -0800 2007 ------- I'm that fast, esp. if its always the same change ;) My opinion is that any2bool is outdated and from a time where sal_Bool had some problems on some compilers. Nowadays I would use the >> operator. But to answer the question from Stephan, adding rBool=false to any2bool is a valid solution. I know its a waste of compiler cycles and additional unused machine assembly code but we have bigger problems to worry about so I'm ok with how it is currently, besides, the API implementations in sd are very high on my housekeeping rework list anyway. Spending time one this now would be heroic but utterly useless on a mid term time frame. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
