To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71158
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 21:35:51 -0800 2007 ------- er: "actually LCM(0.4;1.2) "sort of" works, it just doesn't give the result one would expect" Enjoyed that, thank you :) "As a conclusion we should allow negative arguments, truncate fractional values to integer" OK "(we might come up with a proper fractional algorithm later as an addition if someone feels challenged :)" Doesn't seem likely does it ;) "and return always positive numbers." This is a change in behaviour. That's fine by me because the definition is sensible, but might it cause trouble for previous users? It's useful that the current behaviour is undocumented. I guess this is your decision to make. It would also be useful to have GCD(0;0) return zero by definition. Many thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
