To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73457
User ab changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 15 00:48:31 -0800
2007 -------
Started
I will have a look. I'm not sure if I can fix this for OOo 2.2 due to
limited time and other important tasks, but I will try. Nevertheless
I don't agree with P2. P2 is only justified for huge memory leaks
and within a programming language you can push any leak as
huge as you like by just increasing the loop count.
As this is no regression either, setting to P3, OOo 2.3 for now.
If there is any time left, this task will have top priority and I will
change it to OOo 2.2 then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
