To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68929





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 16 06:04:32 -0800 
2007 -------
In fact unit tests have been written, and (as expected since the patch is
remarkably simple) pass with no problems. [ sent by private mail to Stefan ].

The problem is that they use some ancient, ugly (but actually functional) unit
testing framework [ as opposed, to the new, trendy, (undocumented), and
(apparently) non-functional-out-of-the-box new unit testing framework ].

Thankfully someone kindly sent me the non-public docs on writing C++ unit tests
and I need to dive into this morass and work out why there is such compound
brokenness here; first to get the unit testing framework actually working for
me, and then (of course) to re-write the tests to use it. But as yet I have not
found the time or inclination.

Why, oh why - can I not just type "$ build test" or better "$ test" and get a
simple yes/no answer that works reliably, requires no extra installation /
download / build / documentation foo ? The casual writing of unit testage IMHO
is severely impeeded by the mess here :-)

Anyhow - it's good to vent some spleen; it's a curious decision not to take the
change IMHO, it's obviously correct and saves a noticable chunk of memory.

Utomo: your PDF is not relevant to this and just burns a chunk of space on the
IZ server.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to