To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 10:29:15 -0800 2007 ------- khong, I agree it should be implemented more carefully, i.e., for German, we need a careful review of the dictionary architecture, so that wer-auch-immer is OK, and Arbeits-Amt is not. For Polish, the issue is simpler, as dashes in words cannot be used as in "ready-to-go", and it could be implemented just for Polish. I think we cannot have a more concrete design for that: it is an interplay between the dictionary structure (affix file) and Breakiterator. If the dictionary is not OK, then fixing Breakiterator won't help much, and that's the case now for German. The only thing I could think of is just make hunspell behave by default as if there was "BREAK -" in the affix file, and make Breakiterator pass on the dash. This way there could be no unintentional regression. Laci, what do you think? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
