To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64904
User es changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|es |requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed| |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue type|DEFECT |ENHANCEMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|The "Insert Index/Table" d|Make the behavior of LS/LE
|ialog does apply font form| in TOC more intuitive
|ats correctly |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo Later
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 11:27:00 +0000
2007 -------
So, ok. I can see some enhancement posibilities here.
But as you say in the end, you stuck different things together, thus it could be
closed as INVALID: 1 problem = 1issue...
But let's see your points
----------
1. LS and LF buttons must not have any characteristics. They are plain markers
by themselves. So when we select these buttons, gray out the character style.
-> Ok
----------
2. Provide the other parts with their own independent styles, not dependent upon
LS and LF.
-> Ok
----------
3. By default, insert LS and LF in TOC (and also in Index). That is because most
users would like to make them hyperlinked.
-> Ok. But not in Alphabetical indexes. It is not possible to reference to a
word when having a page bumber as refrerence. This is out of topic here anyway.
----------
4. Let all entries (except LS and LF) inherit their character style from the
actual text in the document (including superscrip and subscript).
The "internet link" style is NOT preferred for these entries, because too many
lines in the TOC list it makes it unreadable.
-> here you address 3 different problems in one! :(
----
a) "all entries inherit their character style from the actual text in the
document"
-> No, because I certainly don't wan't to have a TOC with 24pts font size
entries, just because my Heading have this formatting. The TOC character style
must remain different.
----
b) "including superscrip and subscript"
-> see issue 27377.
----
c) No "Internet link" character style - unreadable.
-> Ok.
----------
5. Instead of editing exisiting styles, provide a direct Format - Character
dialog.
-> Not sure this is more convenient than having a well known style name. Having
different hard formattings instead of short style name may have an influence on
the performance...
==========
Sum up: Make the the default TOC structure containing LS/LE, whithout "Internet
link" formatting and disable character style setting for LS/LE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
