To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76221
User zhongqiyao changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 14 00:52:28 +0000
2007 -------
Thanks for your explanation.
However:
1. You reflected that 2.0.1 is too old (I accept this),
but have to commented
whether 2.2 has already fixed this problem. Moreover, the
current latest Chinese (Traditional chars) version is 2.1,
and 2.2 is not available yet.
2. You mean more numbers is more wide (I accept this),
but this is no *gradual* widening from "1300" to "6000"
(it widened pixel-by-pixel several times). It should widen
from "999" to "1000".
3. You mean "1" is narrower than "7", but this is not
the case for almost all fonts (a column of multidigit
numbers is aligned digit-by-digit). Only in rare fonts
is "1" narrower than "7".
If the specifications has chosen to *gradually*
widen the column to make way for the *step-by-step* increased
number of digits, instead of looking at exactly how many
digits, you may close this bug again as invalid.
Thanks.
Qiyao
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
