To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75857
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 18:37:19 +0000
2007 -------
Houston, we have a problem..
We do have two LangIDs for Uzbek:
#define LANGUAGE_UZBEK_CYRILLIC 0x0843
#define LANGUAGE_UZBEK_LATIN 0x0443
We unfortunately also have two language listbox entries:
< "Uzbek (Cyrillic)" ; LANGUAGE_UZBEK_CYRILLIC ; > ;
< "Uzbek (Latin)" ; LANGUAGE_UZBEK_LATIN ; > ;
However, we do not have two mappings to ISO codes:
{ LANGUAGE_UZBEK_LATIN, "uz", "UZ" },
// { LANGUAGE_UZBEK_CYRILLIC, "uz", "UZ" }, // script codes not
supported yet
The locale data is in Cyrillic script. We can't map that as is.
Question remaining: how widespread is Uzbek(Latin) used? Is it used at all?
Anyway, even if a text was assigned to be Uzbek(Cyrillic) it could not had been
stored as there was no mapping to ISO codes, and upon reloading the document the
text has language "[None]" assigned. This may have led people to use
Uzbek(Latin) instead, which was stored as uz-UZ and reloaded.
How to get out of this mess as long as script codes aren't supported?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
