To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 21:11:38 +0000 2007 ------- pjanik: I don't care at all how this gets fixed. If a new upstream version of the thesaurus fixed it so be it? Do you know ÜPolish and can say this will break? No? Why is is bad to add new data which doesn't break things? In any case, I still think it's suitable for 2.2.1, but if you (brokenly) think it should be 2.3, so be it... I'd still need to fiddle with the source to remove this, but.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
