To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59760
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 11 08:46:58 +0000 2007 ------- Based on the experience we gathered during translaiton for 2.2 we prefer not to provide .xlz any more. The reason? We had major issues in backcoverting the xlz files into po and then into .sdf.... Going forward we will be providing .po and lated xliff files via Pootle, so I think that we should start now using .sdf or .po files... BTW: you can do the bug fixing directly in the .sdf files by using a text editor if you wish.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
