To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75399
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 16:21:04 +0000 2007 ------- Hi Radek, Jan, Well, yes, I should be more responsive. But I'm neither ignoring your work, nor your comments; don't worry. Probably my initial comments weren't as clear as I thought, so please let me try again. As I'm working on the very same problem (plus an additional somewhat invasive change to the store module to save even more memory) as Radeks patch, I am accepting to merge Radeks proposed changes with / incorporate into my own changes (and appropriately recognize Radeks contribution). [btw, Michael should have known that I'm working on the same problem; please ask him]. As both patches (Radeks and my own) are quite large, and heavily interfere on a line by line level (not semantically), the changes can only be merged manually. That's what I meant with "not applying the patch verbatim (as is)", and changed the issue type to "enhancement". Please understand that I'm not going to rework my changes more than necessary to incorporate Radeks changes. But, as I said, your changes will be incorporated, just not "as is". Hope this resolves any misunderstandings, Matthias --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
