To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73693
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 14:06:29 +0000 2007 ------- Yeah, thought about that too. However, since soffice-bin _is_ currently treated as extension-less thing, actually that is the problem: we would need to rename "sofficerc" to "soffice-binrc" to get it recognizes again. Another option would be to only use "soffice" for the binary, but how should we name the start script for X11 then ? OTOH we could reduce the risk of mis-interpretation by only treating "-bin" at the end of the name as something to cut off. The existing code in rtl/bootstrap does pretty much the same thing with ".exe" and ".bin" (and does not handle any generic file extension). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
