To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 07:50:17 +0000 2007 ------- FWIW I'd be in favour of adding trickery, ? for i/l and ? for 4/8 where relevant, but I'm easy about it. If we go a separate mapfile can I suggest that we call it "gcc3_unix_64bit.map" rather than e.g. gcc3_linux_x86-64.map. Whatever way we go here I can fix up the same way the other map files that we never thought of under issue 77975. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
