To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78150 Issue #|78150 Summary|geometry::RealBezierSegment2D needs API change Component|api Version|680m212 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|definition Assigned to|thb Reported by|aw
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 15:59:57 +0000 2007 ------- AW: geometry::RealBezierSegment2D uses (P, C1, C2)-style bezier definition. This is bad for several reasons: - C1 == P and C2 == P is used to express C1 resp. C2 are unused. This is true for C1, but for C2 it would need to be expressed with the next P in the next data section. Because usage of C2==P, a C2 which points (is equal) exactly from next P to P is not expressable. - using (Prev, P, Next)-style definition allows that - it also allows to compute/change continuity with a single segment - it also allows handling a point and it's controls with a single index AW->THB: As we discussed, we should change this to a definition which does not prevent data combinations. For the listed reasons, i propose (Prev, P, Next)-style. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
