To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78198
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 09:29:20 +0000 2007 ------- aw: I can try for sure ;-) The thing is that in fact it would be a more invasive patch working around the inconsistency of the code. ULONG is exactly the same type as sal_uInt32 on 32 bit [== all platforms that are interesting for you ;-)], and I am sure that it makes things more consistent on 64 bit, and more correct in general - so I would really like to get the patch in as it is :-) The patch is really just changing sal_uInt32 -> ULONG and 0xFFFFFFFF -> ULONG_MAX, so really just safe changes on 32bit. Please tell me if you still want to change it :-) BTW, FindObject() is not the only hit of the bug, Exist() is for sure another one. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
