To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 02:15:12 +0000 2007 ------- The patch is useless, it just produces a different type of malfunction. I believe that the problem is independent from Khmer. What I am seeing points at the sequence either not being applied or being applied incorrectly on Windows, independently of what the sequence is. It works correctly for Linux. I don't know enoough about the source to know how collation is done differently on Windows and on Linux, or how the interpretation of the file can be different in both, or if something like Linux line-endings or maybe a BOM or something like this would make the file be understood differently, but I assume that after compilation these things should work just identically in both platforms. Or is one based on ICU, but not the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
