To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78496
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 07:11:37 +0000 2007 ------- @mmeeks: First of all (apart from the usual nitpicking that the STL hash of course is not rather inefficient, as there is no such thing as the STL hash): *What* takes 56million pseudo-cycles less and thus becomes ~3% faster? --- That is, is it worth it at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
