To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77439
User ama changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|STARTED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 14:21:12 +0000
2007 -------
Proposed patches for four files:
atrfrm.cxx, accepted, fixed in CWS swqbf99.
basesh.cxx: rejected, because no real change found in patch?!
pview.cxx: rejected, because change of behavior not acceptable. On the other
hand the problem (wrong sequence of member/initialisation) has been addressed
and fixed in CWS swwarnings.
xmltbli.cxx: partly accepted and fixed in CWS swqbf99. I changed the occurrence
of 0L in ternary operators like proposed because I can imagine that this could
cause trouble to some compilers. But I didn't change any "sal_Int32 nBla = 0L"
into "sal_Int32 nBla(0L)" because I do not know the reason for such a change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
