To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78591
User mba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|requirements |mba -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 09:13:08 +0000 2007 ------- As a patch is announced I don't expect "requirements" to be a good choice for an issue owner. I take the liberty to take it over for the time being. I think in general the RFE is a good idea so I'm looking forward to the patch. There are some problems that come to my mind: - where in memory should we store these settings? Perhaps we could add a new property to the DocumentSettings? (sw/source/ui/uno/SwXDocumentSettings) - It must be clear that when the document is stored to OOo format all these settings will get lost. We will not mutilate ODF for storing an unspecified bunch of data anywhere in the document if this data is more than private information of the user but instead is something that is necessary to handle or display the document properly. But for the direct round trip doc->OOo->doc it would be a good enhancement. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]