To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78267
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 09:11:40 +0000 2007 ------- I think, till we got working MinGW version, we should stick with the solution that already implemented. Just keep in mind, that MinGW-specific version-naming is not good, avoid it where possible, and take care of it after the port is ready... Meanwhile one can check which solution (Nr 3 or 4) is better... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
