To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 11:32:06 +0000 2007 ------- AS->FS: "...please let's keep different things separate..." Normyl yes ... but here we are talking about synchronization of two tasks for at least 4 developers. Why we should write 8 sub tasks with 2 parent tasks for that ... if we can file 1 parent task with 4 sub tasks describing both changes. "The more since issue 63263 has room for discussions. Well, at least "XFilePickerWorkaround" sounds like a highly debatable name to me" ... Yes I know ... and for our Vista implementation I've already made those changes. And there I named the new optional interface XFilePicker2. Will that be OK for you ? .-) BTW: I think there is a point where we should stop discussion within this issue here. Instead we should switch to a newsgroup, chat or similar. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
