To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78883
                 Issue #|78883
                 Summary|470+ versions in version list
               Component|website
                 Version|current
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|www
             Assigned to|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
             Reported by|cmc





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 07:40:05 +0000 
2007 -------
There are approx 470 versions in e.g. the "tools" version list. This is an
unnavigable amount to browse through to select the affected version.

I propose that we drop all the 6?? and 680_m??? where ??? is < current
milestone-5 (SRC680_217 today). And to then drop all the Release Candidates e.g.
*RC?. 

i.e. leaving just the "released" versions of OOo and the last 5 devel
milestones. Ideally to order them with the most recent formal releases of OOo,
and so the most likely version that a submitter has installed, at the top, i.e.
2.2.1, 2.2.0, ... 

It would be sufficient to just restrict the visually-available-for-selection
versions for new bug submission, the versions that existing bugs are logged
against shouldn't change.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to