To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4914
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 12:03:29 +0000 2007 ------- With all due respect, the comparison between the votes for "improved support for bibliographic data (by far the most)" and the votes for Normal View is a huge mistake. The bibiographic data requests come from OOo users. It is a nice-to-have feature for existing users. Noone will decide not to use OOo because it lacks bib-data support. The people asking for Normal View may be a minority but they are representing probably hundreds of thousands of people who simply cannot use OOo. The contributors to this list are just the ones who care to tell you why. Because the lack of Normal View is an absolute showstopper. That being said, I am glad to hear that Normal View is back on the radar. I would love to use OOo again. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
