To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80535 Issue #|80535 Summary|Info fields (meta:user-defined): plain text or not? Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.2 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|save-export Assigned to|mru Reported by|jct1958
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 9 16:18:14 +0000 2007 ------- I have two .odt files (copies available if needed). In each, I've renamed two of their Info fields (i.e. meta:user-defined) and entered version-control system keywords $Archive$ and $Revision$. In the older file, dated 29 Aug 2006, these fields seem to be plain text in the .odt file, the VCS finds them and expands the keywords. In the newer file, dated 27 Jul 2007, they seem to be inside the zipped part, and hence, invisible to my VCS. Grr! Has there been a change to OOo Writer file format here, or am I just confused? Hint: integration of OOo with svn would be much easier if svn could see the Info fields! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
