To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81990





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 15:34:56 +0000 
2007 -------
@rainerbielefeld

Counterquestion: What is your concept for rearranging the rows of a table, e.g. 
a timeline consisting of a few hundred rows?

If you have to move the row "a  b  c  d" below "e  f  g  h", you'll (a) either 
mess up the table's contents completely (if you're used to the behaviour of 
Microsoft programs), or (b)

1. Mark the row "a b c d", copy it's contents
2. Move to the row "i j k l"
3. Click on the menu "Table" or type <Ctrl+t> (in German OOo),
4. Select "Insert" or type <Ctrl+g>
5. Select "Rows" or type <Ctrl+z>
6. Click on "Position: Above" or press <Return>
7. Paste the contents from the clipboard
8. Move up to the former row "a b c d"
9. Select "Table"/"Delete"/"Rows" or press <Ctrl+t>+<l>+<z>

That's a lot of clicking/typing to simply move _one_ row of a table. If you 
have to rearrange a few hundred rows, this might be driving you insane. In 
Microsoft applications and compatibles, all this can be done completely by 
using the mouse _and/or_ keyboard shortcuts, but with significantly less 
clicking/typing (Mark a row, move the cursor to the insertion point and type 
<Alt+d>+<l>, if I remember correctly; I can look this up, if anyone is 
interested; anyway, it's _a lot_ faster).

I think their (Microsofts and those of compatible apps) usability approach is 
to honor the _context_ of the operation; it recognizes if you want to do an 
operation on single cells or complete rows; if you're working on rows, the 
mouse pointer "tilts" a few degrees to the right and marks the complete row; if 
you select single cells or all cells of a row, but not the row itself (!), the 
mouse pointer as well as the inverted colour of the marked section(s) look 
different. This gives a very good feedback to what you're doing.

Thus I'd suggest that OOo Writer should allow context sensitive operations. Of 
course it doesn't necessarily have to mimic the behaviour of Microsoft-style 
apps, but it _should_ allow similar operations, and should be operatable at 
least as fast as "Word" and consorts.

Besides this usability aspects I'd like to stress again that the expected 
behaviour when _inserting_ something is that something is inserted and not 
something else is overwritten. If OOo currently can not honor the context of 
user operations, as Microsoft apllications do, it should at least honor the 
setting of the "Insert/Overwrite" key. If it's set to "Overwrite", OOo Writer 
could behave as it does now, if it is set to "Insert", it should insert the 
full row as a _new_ row.

As to the question what I would expect if marking the block "b  c" and "f  g", 
and then copy and pasting it after click into cell with "g": These are _cell_ 
operations, not _row_ operations, so they could and should behave differently.

Example to prove my point: Mark the block "c d" and "g h", copy it, move to 
"l", and insert it; OOo adds a _new_ row with the contents "_ _ _ g" (the 
underscores are suppose to signify empty cells). 3/4 of the contents to be 
pasted gets lost - that's usually not what a user expects.

For block operations, there are three ways to deal with tha I can think of:

1. Honoring the context of the operations (as described above);
2. Operating in a special block mode, a function most text editors provide;
3. Inserting the full cutted construct at the insertion point, as e.g. Mozilla 
Composer and derivates does (if you cout some cells from a table and insert 
them anywhere else, a new mini-table is inserted on the insertion point).

(3) appears to me at least as logical as the current behaviour of OOo, but it's 
IMHO not very user friendly; thus I'd suggest (1), especially when honoring 
position of the  "Insert/Overwrite" key.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to