To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82420
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 29 17:42:43 +0000 2007 ------- Sorry, it was my mikstake. :-( With If IsNull( oSection.getParentSection() ) Then sString = sString & Chr( 13 ) & oSection.getName() ooomr_recursiveChilds( oSection, 1, sString ) End If you also get the right result at top level. So yes, my arguments don't affect to this issue furthermore. But please have a look at the following: If there are frames in the document and the frames contains sections - where they are located? Frames could be bound to a paragraph or a page. Where should they appear in your order? If there are sections in a document and there is also a frame with sections in it, in this manner, that the view of the sections overlap one another, the navigator shows the order of the view order, not the straight nested section order. (Look at the picture that i attach. The sections beginning with "(f?)" are located in the frame.) I don't know, how the API could reflect this behavior without scanning the view of the document. If you want to get this order and if you could ask the navigator about the sections, perhaps your problem could be solved. But i dont know if that is possible. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
