To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 20 23:04:09 +0000 2007 ------- The reason for this misinformation is our former process to deal with requirements that IMHO is totally broken. Our QA engineers assigned all RFE issues to the user "requirements". Our UX team was thought to wade through them and prioritize them but they never had enough people to actually do that. End of September I got a huge bunch of such issues that a brave UX team members has rescued from the big black oblivion called "requirements". I'm still not done with reviewing them all but sooner or later I would have worked on this one. Fortunately we had started working on this anyway. So yes, Mike's comment urged me to have a look a little bit earlier than I would have done otherwise - but in general we have too much comments like this one in our issues and they make reading them harder as you have more work to find the relevant information. Having a look on the issue history I must admit that I can develop some sympathy for his wish to let off some steam - but I hope you can develop the same for my frustration about getting too much useless "information". Anyway, I hope all will be pleases with getting the feature in 3.0. :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
