To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83133





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 25 05:51:10 +0000 
2007 -------
Just a comment,

> ... My concern is that the strategy is to use cygwin's 
> posix format path like '/cygdrive/x/...' wherever we face problems and use
> a 'wrapper' with commands. As mozilla has their own wrapper it is OK, but for
> other projects I am relying on OOo's wrapper guw.exe, which Volker is planning
> to stop supporting and remove.

No, I don't plan to stop supporting guw.exe, I think we will need it at certain
points. My current CWS nowrapcmd1 (see issue 82202) plans to remove the
$(WRAPCMD) macro/variable and use mixed paths (c:/foo/bar style) whenever
possible. (Have a look at the .WINPATH attribute in dmake 4.11 and newer)
This way we can even remove a lot of special cases from guw again and make it
easier to maintain.

And, yes, it's a shame that the mixed mode handling in make is fixed in the
current CVS version of make, but that no new (g)make was released yet.

P.S.: If we want to avoid hardcoding of guw.exe we should already think about
a successor variable for WRAPCMD, that is unconditionally set in winenv.* and
always points to guw.exe. Maybe $GUWCMD ?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to