To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84285
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 08:50:30 +0000 2007 ------- Well, see http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2006-12/msg04128.html for installing unsigned packages. Or yum --nogpgcheck ... OOo could sign its upstream vanilla rpms if it wanted, e.g. http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-pgp-signing-packages.html http://fedoranews.org/tchung/gpg/ http://vectorzx.blogspot.com/2006/02/how-to-sign-rpm-package.html So that they would be signed, to verify that the signature is correct though the user still has to import the public part of the key. I wouldn't really see this as a OOo bug personally. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
