To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 17:37:35 +0000 2008 ------- No problem with a one line change like the one above. However, to produce a cvs diff -pu you don't need a CVS account, anoncvs does as well, check out sources using cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs ... Are you sure that change doesn't break the other !bFlag case? I didn't check yet. Regarding > parameter 3. At the moment it is a boolean. Why not allow an integer > argment > also. Hence > False = 0 = 30/360 Excel > True = -1,1 = 30E/360 > 2 = 30/360 SIA compliant. That wouldn't do. While zero is interpreted as False, any other value than zero is interpreted as True. Overloading that in future versions could break already existing documents that don't care if True is 1 or some other value than 0, e.g. as a result of an expression. ANother thing: there once was a reference document SMD_Fields_030802.pdf publicly available at some financial services provider or so that claimed the Excel method was called PSA 30 or NASD 30, and Excel was the only application implementing that. Unfortunately the document isn't available anymore. Do you happen to know if that is some "official" name, or whether there are public references one could point to? Thanks Eike --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
