To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85309


User fl changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|RESOLVED                  |CLOSED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 18 15:45:15 +0000 
2008 -------
> What did angry me a little bit, is that this issue has been closed as INVALID.
> It hasn't been yet discussed on the UX list (although I obviously planed to do
> exactly this), it wasn't closed as WONTFIX (which is a viable alternative - no
> enough resources to change something as radically as I proposed), but rather 
> as INVALID.

It was not my intention to anger you in any way. Number one principle of bug
handling is "no emotions, please". I was not sure whether I should choose
WONTFIX or INVALID because both sound bad and I do not want judge the proposal
itself, but want to close a to broad proposal. The only alternative would have
been to set you as the owner of this issue again, do not know if this is
appropriate. Let's start discussions on the mailing lists.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to