To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85309
User fl changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 18 15:45:15 +0000 2008 ------- > What did angry me a little bit, is that this issue has been closed as INVALID. > It hasn't been yet discussed on the UX list (although I obviously planed to do > exactly this), it wasn't closed as WONTFIX (which is a viable alternative - no > enough resources to change something as radically as I proposed), but rather > as INVALID. It was not my intention to anger you in any way. Number one principle of bug handling is "no emotions, please". I was not sure whether I should choose WONTFIX or INVALID because both sound bad and I do not want judge the proposal itself, but want to close a to broad proposal. The only alternative would have been to set you as the owner of this issue again, do not know if this is appropriate. Let's start discussions on the mailing lists. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]