To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85381
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 23 11:24:51 +0000 2008 ------- Sorry, thinking about this in the shower, I came to the conclusion your second patch is still buggy. But I had to write a test program to be sure. Try the attached test program. It contains three implementations of gen_path_list_string(): The original one from ooh680-m3, with my patch, and with your second patch. I just added a couple of debugging printouts to them. Additionally, so that the test program won't actually corrupt the heap itself, I allocate a bit more than the program thinks (look for TEST_PROGRAM_SAFETY). Run the program and pay attention to the output lines saying "Allocated n bytes", "Reallocated to n bytes" and "Wrote to result n bytes". --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
