To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 25 08:20:54 +0000 2008 ------- > Anyway - I'd prefere indeed to ship the sources of the dicitionaries, but this > does not mean, we need to ship the stuff that is needed to build the > dictionaries on each platform, Imo it is enough to be able to build on one Well, it's hunspell - Which we already have. The it's ispell and ispells unmunch. I'd prefer not shipping ispell, too, but there are systems out there not having ispell installed or even available (Windows).. I feared this wouldn't be accepted into the tree at all if ispell was a external build req. OTOH, we can just do it like m--enable-build-mozilla which also needs external things. For hunspell, the current tree doesn't have the "hunspell" binary, that's why this is 3.0 after all, because no Windows person took care about cws hunspellexternal for Windows, and that's the cws also delivering the hunspell binary now. For Mac OS X, the hunspell things should be disabled completely when we have Mac OS X Spellchecker things for that language. > platform - as we do not use the GPL option, we do not really build or change > the dictionaries (actually we are not allowed to do so). Well, people getting it from the OOo source and taking the GPL option would be able to := --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
