To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85898
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 7 23:10:18 +0000 2008 ------- @fs: I see your point, with your specific module (where, as you told, largely reworked the include sections, and even removed guards). I don't see it across the board. This section of files is only seldomly touched - but having inconsistent or even external-lib-dependent header guards is fragile, the code repels outside hackers, it violates a rule of the coding standard - do I need more arguments to justify my wanting this cleaned up? The only thing a few devs need to do is solve a some conflicts manually (and these are _easy_ conflicts, mind that). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
