To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87567
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 15:09:27 +0000 2008 ------- ok, we agreed on the tarball (yes, i would like you to care about conversion of the existing themes). for the naming of the tarball, the only argument to call it classic8 is the leftover (hidden) blob in cvs in case of renaming (and bit of renaming in the according makefile - reminder for me to not forget that). given that i'm an ui illiiterate, i leave that up to you ;) now for a rather uncomfortable point. the cws iconupdate04 got a rather tough schedule meanwhile. if you can deliver your tarball (preferable not attached due to size concerns - you'll never get rid of the in the issue. what about committing it to the cvs branch cws_src680_iconupdate04 in ooo_custom_images/classic[8] directly?) until moday morning CET, we should be able to squeeze that into qa too. if not, all i can offer you is to host a tiny cws right after iconupdate04 got integrated and do the tarball switch there. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
