To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88123





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 12:48:36 +0000 
2008 -------
I carried out some quick check, without downloading the Callas pdfaPilot, and it
seems that the only thing that can give that kind of error is the following
Group dictionary, at the page level:

/Group<</S/Transparency/CS/DeviceRGB/I true>>

It seems that the page is marked as containing transparent elements while there
are not, hence the check tool complains since it found no transparent object on
the page.
This would explain the error, it checks quite strictly against clause 6.4 of ISO
19005-1:2005 Norm.

@pl.
Is the following code (in  PDFWriterImpl::PDFPage::emit):

    if( m_pWriter->getVersion() > PDFWriter::PDF_1_3 )
    {
        aLine.append( "/Group<</S/Transparency/CS/DeviceRGB/I true>>" );
    }

correct?
IMHO we should add that Group dictionary only if the page actually contains
transparencies.

@fjuillet, a couple of questions.

Just for confirmation, is the number of occurrences per document equal to the
page number?

Do you have the same error with an empty page, e.g. a blank page, in this case
with a single occurrence?

Another test would be to check the PDF/A-1 of a document with a single page
containing a single graphical element with a transparency. This last case
shouldn't rise an error.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to