To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88479
User mike_hall changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 21 20:19:14 +0000
2008 -------
OK, have looked at i80089. The advantages are arguable both ways and I would
guess the majority might prefer 'without'. As with the released build, some will
prefer with and some without. How much effort would it be to post both? Those
who strongly prefer 'without' can use Pavel's builds but thus we won't be
testing the official snapshots.
The snapshot page says that the snapshots are without Java and even gives the
without Java file size. That's pretty confusing. I'm reopening because the text
on the snapshots page clearly needs to be corrected if the build is to remain
'with'.
This issue has been reassigned to me, but I can't do anything with it. To whom
can it be reassigned.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
